Current government policy is to enable culling or vaccination of badgers to control bovine Tuberculosis (bTB). The Minister of State for Food Security and Rural Affairs has today (30 August) announced a refresh of the strategy for control of bovine TB and signalled his intention to phase out culling of badgers by the end of the current Parliament.
Natural England welcomes this work to refresh the strategy and has previously signalled its view that vaccination of badgers and other disease control measures should be accelerated to reduce the need for culls. We look forward to working with government on that refresh in our role as statutory conservation adviser. Badgers are an important (and highly protected) part of England’s wildlife and play a vital role in sustaining functioning ecosystems. We look forward to ensuring disease free badger populations continue to thrive.
However, until those new measures are in place Natural England has a duty to continue to determine a number of existing licences to manage badger populations to reduce the risk of bovine TB, in line with current government policy and wildlife law. This article explains Natural England's role and considerations in re-authorising existing licences, including those recently determined.
Government policy
Since it was launched under the previous government, the policy has been to enable the licensed culling or vaccination of badgers for the purpose of controlling the spread of bovine Tuberculosis (bTB), as part of the strategy for achieving Officially Bovine Tuberculosis Free (OTF) status for England. Licences are required because badgers are designated by law as a protected species (Protection of Badgers Act 1992). There are three types of culling licence, which are issued by Natural England. Which licence is applicable will depend on the phase of the proposed culling operations and the TB risk area in England concerned:
- A Badger Disease Control licence is required where culling is to take place for the first time in the High Risk Area or Edge Area of England.
- A Low Risk Area Badger Disease Control licence is required where culling is to take place in a zone of the Low Risk Area (LRA) of England specified by the Animal and Plant Health Agency, where there is evidence that infection with Mycobacterium bovis is present in badgers and linked with infection in cattle herds.
- A Supplementary Badger Disease Control licence is required where culling is to take place to prevent the recovery of the badger population following the completion of annual culling that has lasted at least four years under a Badger Disease Control licence.
Natural England’s role
Natural England has two statutory roles in relation to the bTB policy: one is that of granting wildlife licensing authority for England; the other is conservation adviser to government.
Protected species such as badgers can be managed through licensed control, such as controlled shooting and dispatch of cage-trapped animals, in certain circumstances, including to prevent the spread of disease, as long as a relevant licence is obtained from Natural England following an evidence-based review. This licensing work is not undertaken lightly, and Natural England staff take the welfare of badgers very seriously.
In its licensing role Natural England independently considers licence applications to cull badgers, while taking into account published guidance from the Defra Secretary of State, ensuring that the licensed activity is justified in terms of delivering disease control benefits.
Natural England officers carry out monitoring visits during the culls to check that contractors are complying with licence conditions and best practice guides on shooting and cage trapping.
Conservation is also a big part of our licensing work on the badger cull. Natural England carries out detailed assessments of possible impacts that licensed activity may have on Protected Sites, imposing conditions on the licences to ensure that no harm is caused.
In addition, conservation of badger populations is a consideration of the licence. Licence conditions will ensure local extinctions are avoided and disease-free badger populations can be sustained.
Main considerations in deciding to licence
- The UK Chief Veterinary Officer (CVO) has previously advised that “any gap between the end of one form of badger control and the successful deployment of another, should be as narrow as possible to bank the maximum disease control benefits and ensure progress towards disease eradication by 2038 is not jeopardised”.
- While the scientific evidence shows that disease reduction benefits to cattle achieved through badger culling are sustained for several years, it is currently not possible to conclude when alternative measures will be operationally ready to maintain the reduced disease risk at the scale required.
- Natural England notes the new government plans to work on a comprehensive new TB eradication strategy to end the badger cull and drive down Bovine Tuberculosis (TB) rates to save cattle and farmers’ livelihoods. The plans are welcomed, however it is too early to consider that there is an effective alternative that can be deployed successfully at the timescale and geographic scales required.
Questions Natural England considers when assessing licence applications
Natural England must consider five key questions when deciding whether to license any activity:
- Is the activity for a licensable purpose?
- To what extent would the activity contribute to achieving its objective?
- Is the extent of the activity to be authorised proportionate to the aim, given the particular interests to be protected?
- To what extent could the badgers be protected better by satisfactory alternative measures that would achieve the objective of the activity to the same extent?
- Are we satisfied that the authorised activity does not harm the long-term conservation status of the species?
What has Natural England licensed this year
- Granted nine new Supplementary Badger Control (SBC) licences and authorised culling under these and 17 existing SBC licences (May).
- Authorised the continuation of culling activity in accordance with the terms of licences granted for seven areas entering their fourth year of Intensive Cull (IC) and 11 areas entering their third year of IC (August).
- Issued licence for badger control operations in Hotspot Area HS23, located partly within the TB Low Risk Area (LRA) of Lincolnshire (August), and the application for Hotspot Area HS29 in the LRA in Cumbria is under assessment.
4 comments
Comment by Ryan Dent posted on
What about the predation of red listed species that badger's take a disproportionate effect when the population is to high. A vacation program would not address this issue and as seen in Wales has had little to no effect on the TB kind regards
Ryan Dent
Comment by Guda Van der Burgt posted on
There is a problem with the statement: while scientific evidence shows that disease reduction benefits to cattle achieved through badger culling are sustained for several years.
This has not been shown; the recent Birch paper clearly states that the authors have no idea why the TB in cattle has gone down over the period they looked at. There is no evidence that it was due to badger killing, and almost certainly mostly due to improved cattle measures.
And I am not aware if any NE auditing of the licence conditions with regard to biosecurity either
Comment by Mandy Knott posted on
Having watched the BBC documentary - Badgers, The Farmers and Me featuring Brian May (https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0022710) - I am really interested to understand how Defra and NE are considering the apparent scientific evidence presented in this programme that the spread of Bovine TB is through cattle faeces rather than being air-borne and respiratory, and that the skin testing currently being used is not effective in picking up all cases of infected cattle. Do we know yet whether these are two elements going to be considered under the government's review of badger culling as a means to prevent Bovine TB?
Comment by Chris Simmons posted on
Why aren't the specifics of the area numbers of the 9 new Supplementary licence areas (with target numbers) being published? Likewise, publishing the specifics of ongoing Intensive areas. The lack of transparency has always been worrying but now it seems to be getting even worse. In the past, documents had been released after the commencement of each cull period . It did not give much info, but more than is currently being released.